Ask HN: Should “I asked $AI, and it said” replies be forbidden in HN guidelines?

While the guidelines were written (and iterated on) during a different time, it seems like it might be time to have a discussion about if those sort of comments should be welcomed on HN or not.

Some examples:

– https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46164360

– https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46200460

– https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46080064

Personally, I’m on HN for the human conversation, and large LLM-generated texts just get in the way of reading real text from real humans (assumed, at least).

What do you think? Should responses that basically boil down to “I asked $LLM about $X, and here is what $LLM said:” be allowed on HN, and the guidelines updated to state that people shouldn’t critique it (similar to other guidelines currently), or should a new guideline be added to ask people from refrain from copy-pasting large LLM responses into the comments, or something else completely?